Lip Sinc International, Inc. v. Dick Clark Productions, Inc.

942 F.2d 792 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. LIP SINC INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DICK CLARK PRODUCTIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 89-55674. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 3, 1990. Decided Aug. 28, 1991. 1 Before WALLACE and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Plaintiff/appellant Lip Sinc International, Inc. ("Lip Sinc") appeals from summary judgment in favor of defendants/appellees Dick Clark Productions, Inc. ("Clark"), MCA Television, Ltd. ("MCA"), and Chris Bearde Productions, Inc. ("Bearde"). Lip Sinc asserts trademark infringement, unfair competition, unjust enrichment, and bad faith denial of contract claims. We affirm. BACKGROUND 4 Clark and Bearde are television production companies. MCA is a television distribution company that distributes shows to independent television stations. 5 From September 1984 through October 1988 Clark and Bearde produced…