Corine Proctor, Cross-Appellee v. Consolidated Freightways Corporation of Delaware, a Delaware Corporation, Cross-Appellant

Good Law
942 F.2d 793·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 26346
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 5, 199189-35650California3,054 words

Opinion

Opinion

942 F.2d 793 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Corine PROCTOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS CORPORATION OF DELAWARE, a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant. Nos. 89-35650, 89-35676. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 8, 1991. Decided Sept. 5, 1991. Before WIGGINS, BRUNETTI and THOMAS G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Both parties appeal from the district court's order affirming the magistrate's entry of judgment for damages following its finding that Consolidated Freightways Corporation failed to make a good faith effort to accommodate its employee's religious beliefs. We reverse. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 3 * This case is before this court for the second time. In the first appeal, (Proctor I ) reported at 795 F.2d 1472 (9th Cir.1986), we reversed a summary judgment entered in favor of the employer, Consolidated Freightways Corporation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.