United States v. Jaime Ferreyra-Tagle

942 F.2d 794 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime FERREYRA-TAGLE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10075. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 15, 1991. * Decided Aug. 23, 1991. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, FARRIS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jaime Ferreyra-Tagle, a Peruvian attorney, appeals the district court's imposition of a $10,000 fine after he pled guilty to witness tampering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512 (b). Ferreyra-Tagle contends the court had no information as to his present financial condition, and that the record failed to establish whether he had the earning capacity to pay a fine after his release from incarceration. He claims the court failed to make specific findings on the record to show it considered the seven factors listed under U.S.S.G. § 5E1.2(d) to determine the amount of the fine. See United States v. Seminole, 882 F.2d 441, 443 (9th…