Nited States of America v. Felix Asemota

942 F.2d 794 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. NITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Felix ASEMOTA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-30201. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 8, 1991. Decided Aug. 21, 1991. 1 Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and MACBRIDE, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Felix Asemota challenges his conviction on four counts of using false social security numbers in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408 (g)(2) and one count of credit card fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029 (a)(2). He argues that the district court should have granted his motion to suppress evidence. Asemota also challenges the sentence imposed on him under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We now affirm both conviction and sentence. I. 4 Asemota challenges an otherwise valid search warrant on the grounds that the issuing judge was not neutral and detached as required by Coolidge v. New Hampshire,…