United States v. Mark Henry Nicholson, United States of America v. Leroy Harold Raleigh

942 F.2d 795 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Henry NICHOLSON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leroy Harold RALEIGH, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 90-30447, 90-30448. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 9, 1991. * Decided Aug. 15, 1991. Before GOODWIN, ALARCON and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mark Nicholson and Leroy Raleigh ("appellants") appeal their convictions following their entry of conditional guilty pleas on single counts of manufacturing marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(c). The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 3 * Appellants first argue that Nicholson's consent to enter his residence was invalid because of his extreme intoxication. The district court found "that in spite of…