Charles Woolery A/K/A Chuck Woolery, Teri Woolery, Charwool Productions, Inc., a California Corporation v. Blue Coral, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

942 F.2d 795 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles WOOLERY a/k/a Chuck Woolery, Teri Woolery, Charwool Productions, Inc., a California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BLUE CORAL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-56002. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 15, 1991. * Decided Aug. 28, 1991. 1 Before WILLIAM A. NORRIS and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and KING, District Judge ** . 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 A grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo. 4 Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party, we conclude that there are genuine issues of material fact regarding the meaning and effect of the agreement between the parties and of the release signed by the plaintiff such that summary judgment on the contract and privacy counts is inappropriate. 5 The only competent evidence presented to the court regarding Plaintiff's fraud claim is that Blue Coral presented the Release to…