United States v. Debra Ann Williams

942 F.2d 795 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Debra Ann WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-50272. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 3, 1991. Decided Aug. 22, 1991. Before D.W. NELSON, O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Debra Ann Williams appeals her conviction for misapplication of bank funds, 18 U.S.C. § 656 , and causing the misapplication of bank funds, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 (b), 656. She asserts three claims on appeal, none of which we find to have merit. Accordingly, we affirm. 3 * At the conclusion of her testimony, Williams was questioned by the trial judge regarding certain aspects of the case. This a trial judge may do, see Fed.R.Evid. 614(b), so long as the judge does not "convey to the jury the impression that he has formed an opinion as to the truth of the witness's statement or the verdict that should be returned." United…