United States v. Eva Patrick Verner

942 F.2d 795 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eva Patrick VERNER, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 90-50141, 90-50462. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1991. * Decided Aug. 29, 1991. Before BROWNING, FARRIS and WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Eva Patrick Verner appeals pro se the sentence imposed following her guilty plea to a superseding information charging her in five counts with mail and wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1343. Verner claims the government breached its plea agreement by urging the court to sentence her based on the losses her victims sustained and to impose restitution. She further claims the district court erred by: 1) refusing to hold a hearing on her motion to waive counsel; 2) increasing her sentence based on the government's perjurious account of her victims' losses; 3) sentencing her in violation of the Double…