United States v. Arthur Richard Sanchez

942 F.2d 795 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Richard SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-10422. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1991. * Decided Aug. 28, 1991. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, FARRIS and WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arthur Richard Sanchez appeals his sentence imposed following entry of a guilty plea to one count of possession of counterfeit federal reserve notes, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472 , and one count of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). 3 Counsel for Sanchez filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which identified one possible issue for review: whether the district court erred by imposing the 240 month mandatory minimum sentence under 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(1)(A) where the applicable United States Sentencing Guidelines…