Flores v. Meese

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 9727·942 F.2d 1352·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 17896·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6547
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 9, 199188-6249California21,785 words

Opinion

Opinion

942 F.2d 1352 60 USLW 2125 Jenny Lisette FLORES, a minor, by next friend Mario Hugh GALVEZ-MALDONADO; Dominga Hernandez-Hernandez, a minor, by next friend Jose Saul Mira; Alma Yanira Cruz-Aldama, a minor, by next friend Herman Perililo Tanchez, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Edwin MEESE, III; Immigration & Naturalization Service; Harold Ezell, Defendants-Appellants. No. 88-6249. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued En Banc and Submitted April 18, 1991. Decided Aug. 9, 1991. Ian Fan and Stan Blumenfeld, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellants. Carlos Holguin, National Center for Immigrants' Rights, Inc., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees. William F. Abrams, Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro, San Francisco, Cal., James H. Lovell, Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, Seattle, Wash., Vilma S. Martinez, Munger, Tolles & Olson, Laini Millar-Melnick, Los Angeles, Cal., Susan L. Burrell and Mark I. Soler, Youth Law Center, San Francisco, Cal., E. Richard Larson, Mexican-American Legal Defense and Education Fund, Los Angeles, Cal., John R. Heisse, II, Pettit & Martin, San Francisco, Cal., for the amici curiae. Appeal from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.