Consolidated American Insurance Company v. Mike Soper Marine Services

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 10379·942 F.2d 1421·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 19315·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6747
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 199189-55929California3,074 words

Opinion

Opinion

942 F.2d 1421 CONSOLIDATED AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Counter-defendant-Appellant, v. MIKE SOPER MARINE SERVICES, et al., Defendants, and Carl Mayerhoffer, individually and as Assignee of Michael Soper, Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 89-55929. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 6, 1990. Decided Aug. 23, 1991. As Amended. Irving H. Greines and Marc J. Poster, Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Beverly Hills, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant. Brooks L. Iler, Scott E. Shaffman and Janice R. Mazur, Shaffman, Iler, Palkowitz & Doft, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Before HUG, CANBY and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. HUG, Circuit Judge: 1 This appeal concerns the duty of an insurance carrier to defend an action against the insured. In this case, after the carrier refused the defense, a settlement was reached between the injured claimant and the insured for $1,000,000. The insured assigned his claims against the carrier in exchange for the claimant's covenant not to execute against the insured on the judgment. The injured claimant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.