Victor J. Polich v. Burlington Northern, Inc. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Delaware Corporation

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 10438·942 F.2d 1467·1991 WL 161615·138 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2624·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 19685
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 199190-35327California2,891 words

Opinion

Opinion

Goodwin, J.

Following a series of mergers and reorganizations, the Burlington Northern Railroad Company closed its railroad operations in Livingston, Montana. Appellants, who include both former Livingston employees and spouses of former employees, sued the Burlington Northern Railroad Company and Burlington Northern, Inc. (collectively, BN) for damages arising out of the closure. They appeal the dismissal of the action for want of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The complaint alleged that BN breached its promise to employees and their spouses to keep its Livingston railroad facilities open and operational, and committed actual and constructive fraud in closing the facilities. The complaint alleged that BN made these promises during the course of two different corporate reorganizations.

The first incident allegedly occurred in 1970, when Burlington Northern, Inc. (the predecessor to the current BNRC) was created as a result of an Interstate Commerce Commission-approved merger among several railroads. The complaint alleged that at the time of this merger, railroad officials made public assurances that railroad facilities in Livingston would never…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.