United States v. Hector Gonzales-Garza

943 F.2d 55 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector GONZALES-GARZA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-30411. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 5, 1991. Decided Sept. 10, 1991. Before CANBY, DAVID R. THOMPSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Hector Gonzales-Garza appeals his conviction at jury trial for possession with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). 3 Counsel for Gonzales-Garza filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which identified one possible issue for review: whether there was sufficient evidence to support Gonzales-Garza's conviction. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we grant counsel's request to withdraw and affirm the sentence. 4 Gonzales-Garza waived his objection to the sufficiency of the evidence by failing to raise the argument in a motion for acquittal. See United States…