Shelby Brown v. Fmc Corporation

943 F.2d 55 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Shelby BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FMC CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 90-16549, 90-15925. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1991. * Decided Sept. 9, 1991. Before D.W. NELSON, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Brown appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of FMC Corporation. She claims that the company violated the California Fair Employment and Housing Act by firing her because she was disabled. We affirm. 3 Brown does not raise any genuine issues of material fact. She does not submit evidence contesting FMC's claim that economic factors forced it to reduce its forces. Nor does she show that any worker in her job classification who was not terminated had lower seniority. Brown cannot point to any facts indicating that FMC discriminated against its employees or did not abide by the collective bargaining agreement…