Randal v. Farrar v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, a Delaware Corporation the United Transportation Union

943 F.2d 55 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Randal V. FARRAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; the United Transportation Union, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-15854. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1991. * Decided Sept. 6, 1991. Before D.W. NELSON, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Randal Farrar appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of his former employer, the Southern Pacific Transportation Co. ("SPTC") and the United Transportation Union ("UTU") in his action under the Railway Labor Act ("RLA"). We affirm. BACKGROUND FACTS 3 SPTC is a railroad carrier as defined by the RLA, 45 U.S.C. § 151 . On January 21, 1986, SPTC first dismissed Farrar from his employment. The UTU appealed Farrar's termination to the Special Adjustment Board ("the Board"). The Board ordered SPTC to reinstate Farrar. On…