United States v. David Holder

943 F.2d 56 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David HOLDER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-10629. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 5, 1991. * Decided Sept. 10, 1991. Before CANBY, DAVID R. THOMPSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David Holder appeals his sentence, imposed under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (Guidelines or U.S.S.G.), following his guilty plea to possession of a document making implement with intent to produce false identification documents in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (a)(5). Holder claims the district court improperly increased his base offense level based on unsupported findings that his crime involved more than minimal planning or a scheme to defraud more than one victim and caused losses in excess of $20,000. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. Facts 1 3 FBI agents arrested Holder's nephew, Michael Yancey,…