United States v. Catherine Williams

943 F.2d 56 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Catherine WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-10411. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 9, 1991. * Decided Sept. 13, 1991. 1 Before CANBY and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges and Nielsen, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Catherine Williams appeals her conviction for possession of marijuana with the intent to distribute. Williams argues that the trial court erred by admitting jewelry and jewelry receipts into evidence and by allowing the government improperly and prejudicially to cross-examine her about a note found in her home. Williams also argues that the trial court erred by not granting her motions for judgment of acquittal and for a new trial because the evidence was insufficient to support the jury verdict. 4 We affirm Williams' conviction. BACKGROUND 5 On January 12, 1990, a federal agent found tracks of seven individuals in an…