Theresa McINNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, California, Department of Consumer Affairs, Defendants-Appellees

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 10544·943 F.2d 1088·1991 WL 163772·56 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1257·57 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,946
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 28, 199189-16242California4,863 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fletcher, J.

Plaintiff Theresa Mclnnes appeals from the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment in her Title VII employment discrimination suit against the State of California and the California Department of Consumer Affairs (“DCA”). The district court held, based on issue preclusion, that Mclnnes’s suit was barred by a prior decision of the California State Personnel Board (“SPB”) awarding Mclnnes damages and other remedies for the same discrimination alleged in her federal complaint. Because unreviewed state administrative decisions lack preclusive effect in subsequent Title VII actions, we reverse.

FACTS

The present suit is but one skirmish in an ongoing battle between Mclnnes and her government employers over sexual harassment and discrimination. Mclnnes commenced her employment with the government of California in 1978, when she joined the California Department of Justice (“DOJ”) as an Associate Governmental Program Analyst. Three years later she filed a complaint with the DOJ, alleging that her supervisors and co-workers had harassed and discriminated against her because of her gender. In June of 1984, Mclnnes and the DOJ entered into a stipulated settlement of her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.