United States v. One Bell Jet Ranger Ii Helicopter

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 10729·943 F.2d 1121·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 20214·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7035
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 3, 199189-35551California3,631 words

Opinion

Opinion

943 F.2d 1121 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ONE BELL JET RANGER II HELICOPTER, Identification No. N8190j (Registered to Sam Jaksick, 1013 Lakeshore Drive, Indian Village, Nevada), Defendant, and Great Western Helicopters, Inc., Claimant-Appellee. No. 89-35551. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 8, 1990. Decided Sept. 3, 1991. John A. Bryson, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant. Brian T. Butler; Michael J. Hemovich, Hemovich, Nappi, Oreskovich & Butler, Spokane, Wash., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. Before FLETCHER, FARRIS and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: 1 The United States appeals the denial of forfeiture of a helicopter allegedly used to harass big horn sheep in violation of the Airborne Hunting Act ("AHA"), 16 U.S.C. 742j-1. The government argues that the district court erred by (1) requiring a showing of specific intent to harass wildlife in a civil forfeiture proceeding, (2) refusing to use the definition of harass promulgated by the agency authorized to implement the statute, (3) finding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.