Safeco Insurance Company of America v. Kimberly McAllister Individually and as Guardian of Joseph McAllister a Minor, and Warren L. McAllister

944 F.2d 909 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kimberly MCALLISTER, individually and as guardian of Joseph McAllister, a minor, and Warren L. McAllister, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 90-35768, 90-35795. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 1, 1991. Decided Sept. 19, 1991. 1 Before WALLACE, BEEZER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 * The appellants have not alleged wrongful acts by Safeco in any case except their own. Within their case, they have not alleged multiple violations of the MUCSPA sufficient to rise to the level of a general business practice. Klaudt v. Flink, 658 P.2d 1065, 1066 (Mont.1983). The district court did not err in granting summary judgment for Safeco on the appellants' statutory claims. II 4 Courts in other jurisdictions have interpreted similar policy language to exclude the coverage sought in this case. See, e.g., Marchese v.…