Dale Perkins, Leon Lincicum, Harold Hulse, Stanley Humphrey v. Gte Northwest Incorporated, a Washington Corporation

944 F.2d 909 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dale PERKINS, Leon Lincicum, Harold Hulse, Stanley Humphrey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GTE NORTHWEST INCORPORATED, a Washington corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-35544. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 9, 1991. Decided Sept. 12, 1991. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Dale Perkins, Leon Lincicum, Harold Hulse, and Stanley Humphrey (the Employees) brought suit in an Oregon state court against GTE Northwest Incorporated (GTE) stating that they were employees of GTE, "subject to the terms and conditions of collective bargaining agreements between defendant and Local Union No. 89 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers." They contended that GTE had agreed to pay a per diem allowance, specified in the collective bargaining agreements; that they had performed "all conditions required of them under the agreements" and "met…