Oscar Morris v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Donald W. Muse, Jane Doe Muse, Clarence Thomas

944 F.2d 909 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Oscar MORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Donald W. Muse, Jane Doe Muse, Clarence Thomas, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-35236. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 9, 1991. * Decided Sept. 12, 1991. Before EUGENE WRIGHT, FARRIS and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Oscar Morris appeals a judgment entered following a bench trial in his action alleging harassment and retaliatory discharge pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a). Morris argues that the district court erred in finding that his former employer, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, did not build an adverse record against him in retaliation for his engaging in protected conduct. We affirm. 3 We review for clear error the district court's finding that no retaliation occurred. Ruggles v. California Polytechnic State University, 797 F.2d 782, 784 (9th Cir.1986); Wrighten v.…