Toyota of Berkeley, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Local 1095 Automobile Salesmen's Union, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Toyota of Berkeley, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Local 1095 Automobile Salesmen's Union, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

944 F.2d 910 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. TOYOTA OF BERKELEY, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. LOCAL 1095 AUTOMOBILE SALESMEN'S UNION, et al., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. TOYOTA OF BERKELEY, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. LOCAL 1095 AUTOMOBILE SALESMEN'S UNION, et al., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Nos. 89-15893, 89-15945, 89-16539 and 89-16540. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 3, 1991. Decided Sept. 17, 1991. Before TANG, FARRIS and D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 In these consolidated appeals, appellant and cross-appellee Automobile Salesmen's Union Local 1095, substituted in these proceedings by United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 1179, appeals the district court's vacatur of an award granting Floyd Johnson back pay and the district court's partial vacatur of an award granting William Eccles back pay. Both awards arose from labor disputes arbitrated under a…