Lincoln Lane Addleman, Jr. v. Dennis Marsh, Executive Secretary, Indeterminate Sentence Review Board
Opinion
Opinion
945 F.2d 408 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lincoln Lane ADDLEMAN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dennis MARSH, Executive Secretary, Indeterminate Sentence Review Board, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-35301. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 4, 1991. * Decided Oct. 8, 1991. Before HUG, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lincoln Lane Addleman, Jr., a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order denying him leave to file his pro se civil rights complaint in forma pauperis on the grounds that the action was frivolous and failed to state a claim. We review for an abuse of discretion, O'Loughlin v. Doe, 920 F.2d 614, 616 (9th Cir.1990), and affirm. 3 In his complaint, Addleman alleged that Marsh, the Executive Secretary of the Washington Indeterminate Sentence Review Board, denied him his rights to due process and equal protection in connection with a parole consideration hearing. He…