Gary St. Hilaire v. Robert Corbin, Arizona Attorney General, Samuel Lewis, Officer Lowery, Officer Striker

945 F.2d 409 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gary ST. HILAIRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert CORBIN, Arizona Attorney General, Samuel Lewis, Officer Lowery, Officer Striker, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-15894. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 4, 1991. * Decided Oct. 8, 1991. Before HUG, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gary St. Hilaire, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against various Arizona state prison officials. He contends that the district court improperly dismissed the Arizona Attorney General as a defendant, and that the district court erred by dismissing his action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 We review a dismissal for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) de novo. Tanner v. Heise, 879 F.2d 572, 576 (9th Cir.1989). All…