Edward A. Mead, Jose Gonzalez v. Amos E. Reed, Jose Gonzalez v. Amos E. Reed, Joseph D. Lehman, Kenneth Ducharme

946 F.2d 898 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward A. MEAD, Jose Gonzalez, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Amos E. REED, et al., Defendant-Appellant. Jose GONZALEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Amos E. REED, Joseph D. Lehman, Kenneth Ducharme, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 89-35021, 89-35026. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 10, 1991. * Decided Oct. 21, 1991. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Jan. 10, 1992. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 When Jose Gonzalez and Edward Mead were housed at the Washington State Reformatory (WSR), they brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the WSR denied them adequate access to the courts. Gonzalez appeals the district court's dismissal of his damage claim at the conclusion of the plaintiffs' case, and its refusal to order the WSR to expand its law library collection. 1 The district court did issue an injunction…