Jack W. Glenham v. Cletus E. Austin Daniel Brink David L. Michie Murphy & Elgot June Powers Nancy Stroman, Jack W. Glenham v. Cletus E. Austin Daniel Brink Murphy & Elgot June Powers, and David L. Michie Nancy Stroman John Doe

947 F.2d 949 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jack W. GLENHAM, et al, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cletus E. AUSTIN; Daniel Brink; David L. Michie; Murphy & Elgot; June Powers; Nancy Stroman, et al, Defendants-Appellees. Jack W. GLENHAM, et al, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cletus E. AUSTIN; Daniel Brink; Murphy & Elgot; June Powers, Defendants, and David L. Michie; Nancy Stroman; John Doe, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 89-35659 and 89-35726. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 8, 1991. Decided Nov. 7, 1991. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The plaintiffs in this case (collectively "Glenham") brought an action against the defendants under the RICO statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (c)-(d). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, and Glenham now appeals. We affirm. 3 To establish a RICO claim, Glenham must prove that the defendants engaged in at…