Clifford Electronics, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Lo-Jack Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee

947 F.2d 949 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. CLIFFORD ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellant, v. LO-JACK CORPORATION, Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellee. No. 90-55331. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 9, 1991. Decided Oct. 25, 1991. Before HUG, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Clifford Electronics, Inc. (plaintiff below) appeals an adverse summary judgment in its federal antitrust action. We affirm. 3 This antitrust case concerns a police-assisted stolen vehicle recovery network ("SVRN"). A SVRN permits police officials to track, locate and recover stolen motor vehicles. For the purposes of this case, a SVRN consists of two major components: (1) a radio transponder, which is installed in an automobile and emits a unique radio signal, and (2) the "law enforcement components," which consist of radio antennae scattered over the coverage area, a computer at a police station,…