United States v. Jose Nubla Ching, United States of America v. Daniel Metiam, United States of America v. Bonifacio Garcia

947 F.2d 951 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Nubla CHING, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel METIAM, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bonifacio GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 90-10333, 90-10334 and 90-10335. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued June 13, 1991. Submitted Oct. 24, 1991. Decided Nov. 7, 1991. 1 Before GOODWIN, BEEZER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * BACKGROUND 3 Appellants Jose Nubla Ching, Daniel Metiam, and Bonifacio Garcia were convicted of conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 , and of the sale of stolen securities in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2315 . Appellants were sentenced to fifteen months of imprisonment each. We affirm. DISCUSSION I. Testimony About the Firearms 4 The district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing Saulog and Salvador to testify…