Azul Pacifico, Incorporated, a California Corporation v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal Corporation, Azul Pacifico, Incorporated, a California Corporation v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal Corporation

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 13599·948 F.2d 575·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 26335·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8840
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 1, 199190-55853California7,721 words

Opinion

Opinion

948 F.2d 575 60 USLW 2321 AZUL PACIFICO, INCORPORATED, a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellant. AZUL PACIFICO, INCORPORATED, a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 90-55853, 90-56066. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 11, 1991. Submission Vacated Aug. 29, 1991. Resubmitted Oct. 1, 1991. Decided Nov. 1, 1991. Gwendolyn Ryder Poindexter, Deputy City Attorney, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant. Sherman L. Stacey, Santa Monica, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. David Pettit, Hedges, Powe & Caldwell, Los Angeles, Cal., for amici curiae, counties of Santa Barbara and Santa Cruz and cities Arroyo Grande, Carson, Cathedral City, Fremont, Lompoc, Morro Bay, Oceanside, San Jose, San Marcos and Santa Paula, Cal. Bruce E. Stanton, Crosby & Stanton, San Jose, Cal., for amicus curiae, Golden State Mobilehome Owners League, Inc. Timothy A. Bittle, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, Cal., for amicus curiae, Pacific Legal Foundation. Appeal from the United States District Court for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.