United States of America, Transmix Corp., Intervenor-Appellee v. Canyon Country Enterprises, Inc., Dba Curtis Sand & Gravel

949 F.2d 399 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Transmix Corp., Intervenor-Appellee, v. CANYON COUNTRY ENTERPRISES, INC., dba Curtis Sand & Gravel, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-55302. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 12, 1991. Decided Dec. 5, 1991. 1 Before BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and HOLLOM B WIGGINS, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Pursuant to a settlement agreement with Canyon Country Enterprises, Inc., dba Curtis Sand and Gravel (Curtis), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) offered sand and gravel rights for competitive sale. Transmix Corporation (Transmix) outbid Curtis. Curtis moved to enforce the settlement agreement according to Curtis' interpretation and to enjoin the government from contracting with Transmix. The district court denied the motion by final order and Curtis appealed. We affirm. 4 * Several hundred acres of land form the core of the case. This…