United States v. Richard L. Radley, Aka: Ricky Larue Radley Aka: Ricky Lareau Radley (True Name)
Opinion
Opinion
949 F.2d 400 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard L. RADLEY, aka: Ricky Larue Radley; aka: Ricky Lareau Radley (true name), Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 90-50259, 90-50383. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1991. * Decided Dec. 4, 1991. 1 Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, Circuit Judge, and TANNER, ** District Judge. MEMORANDUM 2 Radley and Hardin appeal from their convictions for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 3 Radley contends that the district court improperly denied his motion to sever because the defenses presented by Radley and Hardin were mutually exclusive. A district court's decision to deny a motion to sever is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Unruh, 855 F.2d 1363, 1374 (9th…