Leroy H. JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAYLESS DRUG STORES NORTHWEST, INC., Dba Wonder World, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 14874·950 F.2d 586·1991 WL 255908·57 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,110·66 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 355
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 199190-16173California647 words

Opinion

Opinion

Leroy H. Johnson, Jr., appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his employment discrimination action against Payless Drug Stores Northwest, Inc. (“Payless”), which he brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

I

Johnson contends that the district court erred by dismissing his action without prejudice for lack of venue under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(3) because the Northern District of California is an appropriate venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 . This contention lacks merit.

The relevant statutory language demonstrates that the venue provisions in section 2000e-5(f)(3) apply to this case. Section 2000e-5(f)(3) of Title VII provides in relevant part:

Section 1391, in contrast, is the general federal venue statute; its provisions apply in a civil action not founded solely on diversity of citizenship “except as otherwise provided by law.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (b).

Thus, it is clear that section 1391 “has its limitations.” Bolar v. Frank, 938 F.2d 377, 378 (2d Cir.1991) (per curiam). “Moreover, venue for [Johnson’s] right of action is circumscribed by the very…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.