Robert M. St. John, Margaret E. St. John v. United States of America, Robert M. St. John, Margaret E. St. John v. United States

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 15408·951 F.2d 232·1991 WL 262413·69 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 334·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 29185
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 199190-35174, 90-35210California1,718 words

Opinion

Opinion

The government appeals the district court’s order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. It argues the district court erred in holding the government must assess a deficiency in a taxpayer’s tax within a reasonable period of time, and therefore in submitting to the jury an interrogatory asking whether the government had done so in the St. John’s case. Taxpayers cross-appeal, claiming the jury erred in finding against them on two other interrogatories.

I

Internal Revenue Code § 6501(a) provides that taxes must be assessed within three years after the return is filed. An exception is allowed where the IRS and the taxpayer have consented in writing to assessment after the expiration of the three years. I.R.C. § 6501(c)(4). Form 872-A was drafted pursuant to this exception.

Form 872-A provides the extension of the limitations period will terminate 90 days after any one of three events occur: (A) the IRS mails a Form 872-T, Notice of Termination of Special Consent to Extend the Time to Assess Tax, to the taxpayer; (B) the IRS office considering the case receives a Form 872-T from the taxpayer; or (C) the IRS mails a notice of deficiency to the taxpayer. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.