Allstate Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation v. Rose Marie Belezos Thomas Belezos, and Lovejoy Specialty Hospital, Inc.

951 F.2d 358 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rose Marie BELEZOS; Thomas Belezos, Defendants-Appellants, and Lovejoy Specialty Hospital, Inc., Defendant. No. 90-35633. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1991. Decided Dec. 24, 1991. Before TANG, O'SCANNLAIN and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Allstate Insurance Company ("Allstate") filed a declaratory judgment action in federal district court in August 1989, seeking a ruling that it has no duty to defend or indemnify Rosemary Belezos in the Oregon state court action filed against her and other anti-abortion protestors by Lovejoy Specialty Hospital ("Lovejoy"). The district court granted summary judgment for Allstate, holding that neither the Belezoses' homeowners policy nor their umbrella excess liability insurance policy required Allstate to defend or indemnify Rosemary Belezos.…