Sharon Altenhoff, AKA Sharon Neely v. James Rowland, Director, Department of Corrections, State of California John Van De Kamp, Attorney General of the State of California

951 F.2d 358 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sharon ALTENHOFF, aka Sharon Neely, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James ROWLAND, Director, Department of Corrections, State of California; John Van De Kamp, Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. Nos. 90-56275, 91-55509. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1991. * Decided Dec. 16, 1991. 1 Before SCHROEDER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and HOGAN, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Sharon Altenhoff appeals the dismissal of her writ of habeas corpus by the district court. Altenhoff was tried and convicted by a California state court jury on four counts of grand theft in violation of Cal.Penal Code § 487(1). She unsuccessfully appealed to the California State Court of Appeal and was denied a petition for review by the California Supreme Court. She sought a federal writ of habeas corpus which the district court dismissed based on the findings, conclusions,…