Pat Melton Bonnie Melton, a Marital Community v. Floyd Randall Moore, AKA F. Randall Moore, AKA Randy Moore, Dba Randy's Automotive

951 F.2d 361 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Pat MELTON; Bonnie Melton, a marital community, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Floyd Randall MOORE, aka F. Randall Moore, aka Randy Moore, dba Randy's Automotive, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-35080. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 4, 1991. * Decided Jan. 8, 1992. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, DAVID R. THOMPSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In an opinion filed January 13, 1992 we held that the Supreme Court's change in the standard of proof for establishing a dischargeability claim under section 523(a) of the Bankruptcy Act, announced in Grogan v. Garner, 111 S.Ct. 654, 661 (1991), would not be given retroactive effect to afford Pat and Bonnie Melton a new trial. In this memorandum disposition we reject the Meltons' remaining arguments. 3 The decision of the district court, which affirmed the bankruptcy court, is affirmed. A. Benefit Required to Impute Fraud 4 The Meltons…