R.W. Beck & Associates, and Admiral Insurance Company v. City and Borough of Sitka Providence Washington Insurance Company

951 F.2d 362 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. R.W. BECK & ASSOCIATES, et al., Plaintiff, and Admiral Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND BOROUGH OF SITKA; Providence Washington Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-35708. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 22, 1991. Decided Dec. 16, 1991. Before TANG, REINHARDT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Admiral Insurance Company (hereinafter "Admiral") appeals an order from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska granting the City and Borough of Sitka's motion for summary judgment on Admiral's declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration of no coverage under the terms of insurance policies between Admiral and Sitka. We affirm the district court's ruling. 3 The City and Borough of Sitka (hereinafter "Sitka") owned and operated Blue Lake Dam. Sitka hired the independent engineering firm of R.W. Beck and Associates…