United States v. Andres Navarro-Lopez, United States of America v. Ignacio Cabanillas-Zatarain

951 F.2d 364 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andres NAVARRO-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ignacio CABANILLAS-ZATARAIN, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 90-50655, 90-50662. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1991. Decided Dec. 13, 1991. Before SNEED, BEEZER and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Andres Navarro-Lopez appeals his jury conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine. Ignacio Cabanillas-Zatarain appeals his jury conviction for aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute cocaine. These criminal actions were a result of a border patrol stop where cocaine was seized from a secret compartment in the trunk of an automobile. We affirm. 3 * Both Navarro-Lopez and Cabanillas-Zatarain argue that the stop of the vehicle by Border Patrol Agents was not supported by "founded suspicion." We review de…