Frank E. Voth v. Keith Meisenheimer, Asst. District Attorney Brenda Rohrbach Sally Avera, Public Defender Robert E. Jones, District Judge

951 F.2d 365 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frank E. VOTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Keith MEISENHEIMER, Asst. District Attorney; Brenda Rohrbach; Sally Avera, Public Defender; Robert E. Jones, District Judge, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35486. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 20, 1991. * Decided Dec. 27, 1991. Before WILLIAM A. NORRIS, WIGGINS and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frank E. Voth, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm in part, and vacate and remand in part. 3 In his amended complaint, Voth sued various defendants for alleged violations of his constitutional civil rights in connection with his state court conviction. Thus, as the district court correctly recognized, Voth's section 1983 action sought to collaterally attack his state court conviction. 4 We have held that…