Albert Parker, Plaintiff/cross-Defendant and Appellant/cross-Appellee v. U.S. Suzuki Motor Corporation, Defendant/cross-Complainant and Appellee/cross-Appellant

952 F.2d 407 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Albert PARKER, Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant and Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. U.S. SUZUKI MOTOR CORPORATION, et al., Defendant/Cross-Complainant and Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Nos. 90-55056, 90-55179. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 9, 1991. Decided Dec. 27, 1991. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, ALARCON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Albert Parker alleged that American Suzuki Motor Corporation (Suzuki) fired him because of his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 . Parker also alleged that he signed a release of all claims against Suzuki under duress. Suzuki filed a counterclaim requesting a judgment for breach of contract, specific performance, rescission, and fraud. Parker appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Suzuki. Suzuki appeals from the dismissal of its…