Pablo Arnulfo Ruiz-Juarez v. Richard C. Smith, District Director, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service

952 F.2d 407 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Pablo Arnulfo RUIZ-JUAREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Richard C. SMITH, District Director, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-35270. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1991. * Decided Jan. 7, 1992. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, DAVID R. THOMPSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ruiz-Juarez's attorney requests an award of attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 241 (1). Before his attorney made a request for fees, exclusion proceedings began that resulted in the transfer of Ruiz-Juarez to Guatemala. Consequently, his attorney wishes to stand in his shoes and collect the fees on his behalf. 3 An attorney fee award is the property of the party and not his attorney. Evans v. Jeff D., 475 U.S. 728 , 730-31 n. 19 (1986). Evans indicates that a party may waive or assign his right to the fee. Id. at 731.…