Robert Brigaerts v. Sheriff Cardoza San Mateo County Board of Supervisors San Mateo Superior Court

952 F.2d 1399 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert BRIGAERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sheriff CARDOZA; San Mateo County Board of Supervisors; San Mateo Superior Court, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15437. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 9, 1992. * Decided Jan. 15, 1992. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and SNEED and ALARCON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Brigaerts, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his civil rights complaint against prison officials. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Jackson v. Arizona, 885 F.2d 639, 640 (9th cir. 1989), and affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand. 3 We construe the district court's dismissal of Brigaerts's complaint prior to service of process as a dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d). Frivolous in forma pauperis complaints may be dismissed sua sponte under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d).…