Reza Hosseini v. Mohammad Akram Chowdry, Reza Hosseini v. Mohammad Akram Chowdry, and the Saar Foundation, Inc., a Virginia Corporation

953 F.2d 1387 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Reza HOSSEINI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mohammad Akram CHOWDRY, Defendant-Appellant. Reza HOSSEINI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mohammad Akram CHOWDRY, and the Saar Foundation, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 90-16058, 90-16287. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 9, 1991. Decided Jan. 31, 1992. 1 Before WILLIAM A. NORRIS and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** OVERVIEW 3 Reza Hosseini sued Mohammad Akram Chowdry for breach of contract and fraud. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Hosseini for $3,310 on the contract claim, $79,440 on the fraud claim, and awarded $165,500 in punitive damages. The district court denied Hosseini's request for prejudgment interest. Judgment was entered accordingly. 4 Chowdry appeals from the judgment on the jury verdict. Hosseini cross-appeals from the district court's denial of…