United States v. Michael Scott Cummings, United States of America v. William James Cummings, Jr.

953 F.2d 1388 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Scott CUMMINGS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William James CUMMINGS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-30076, 91-30079. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 8, 1992. Decided Feb. 7, 1992. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied April 23, 1992. As Amended Dec. 17, 1992. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, D.W. NELSON and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Both William and Michael Cummings claim that there was insufficient evidence to sustain the verdicts against them. In evaluating these claims, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the government. United States v. Sanchez-Mata, 925 F.2d 1166, 1166 (9th Cir.1991) (citations omitted). The government also is entitled to "all reasonable inferences which may be drawn from [the evidence]." United States v. Davis, 932 F.2d 752,…