In Re Joanne M. Weston, Debtor. Joanne M. Weston, Dba Weston Enterprises v. Franklin S. Cibula, a Law Corporation William L. Conway, Trustee

Good Law
953 F.2d 1390·1992 WL 16806·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 7104
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 4, 199290-16709California368 words

Opinion

Opinion

953 F.2d 1390 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Joanne M. WESTON, Debtor. Joanne M. WESTON, dba Weston Enterprises, Appellant, v. Franklin S. CIBULA, a Law Corporation; William L. Conway, Trustee, Appellees. No. 90-16709. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 13, 1991. * Decided Feb. 4, 1992. Before WILLIAM A. NORRIS, BEEZER and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Joanne Weston ("Weston") appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") dismissal of her appeal from two orders of the bankruptcy court and from the BAP's denial of her motion for rehearing. We affirm. 3 Weston's notice of appeal to the BAP was clearly untimely. See Bankr.R. 8002(a). She neither sought nor received an extension of time to file her appeal under Bankr.R. 8002(c), and, in the absence of any assurance from the bankruptcy court that her appeal had been properly filed, there was no automatic extension of time. See In re Slimick, 928 F.2d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.