Susan Ochs v. Disability Income Plan of Mobil Oil Corporation Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

954 F.2d 727 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Susan OCHS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DISABILITY INCOME PLAN OF MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, et al; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55121. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 6, 1992. * Decided Feb. 13, 1992. Before TANG, KOZINSKI and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Susan Ochs appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to Mobil Oil Corporation. The district court ruled that Mobil's decision to deny long term disability benefits to Ochs was not arbitrary or capricious. Ochs' appeal alleges that the court erroneously used a deferential standard of review; that even under a deferential standard of review, she was entitled to disability benefits; and that the trustees breached their fiduciary duty in their administration of the program. We affirm. I. 3 Ochs alleges that a deferential standard of review was erroneously applied by the district…