Karl J. Keller v. United States Parole Commission Attorney General, Ca, of the United States

955 F.2d 47 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Karl J. KELLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION; Attorney General, CA, of the United States, Respondents-Appellees. No. 91-35915. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 13, 1992. * Decided Feb. 18, 1992. Before CANBY, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Karl J. Keller, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. 3 In his petition, Keller, who pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a) and (d), contends that the United States Parole Commission should not have used seven dismissed counts of bank robbery to determine his offense severity and presumptive release date. We have already considered and rejected this argument. See United States v. Keller, 902 F.2d 1391, 1393 (9th Cir.1990) (Keller I ). 4 Keller contends, however, that…