Charles W. Mason, D.D.S. v. Sybron Corporation American Hospital Supply Corporation Ormco, Charles W. Mason, D.D.S. v. Sybron Corporation American Hospital Supply Corporation Ormco
Opinion
Opinion
955 F.2d 48 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles W. MASON, D.D.S., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SYBRON CORPORATION; American Hospital Supply Corporation; Ormco, Defendants-Appellants. Charles W. MASON, D.D.S., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SYBRON CORPORATION; American Hospital Supply Corporation; Ormco, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 90-35897, 91-35245. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 9, 1991. Decided Feb. 19, 1992. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Ormco contends that the district court committed reversible error when it refused to instruct the jury to consider the six Restatement factors in determining whether a trade secret existed. Ormco also contends that the district court abused its discretion when it admitted Charles Schultz's testimony about the innovativeness of Mason's idea. Ormco also appeals the district court's decision to refuse to admit three photographs and to delay…