Carlyle Norman Marian Norman v. Allstate Insurance, an Illinois Corporation, and Does 1 Through 10, Inclusive

956 F.2d 275 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Carlyle NORMAN; Marian Norman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE, an Illinois Corporation, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-15119. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 14, 1992. Decided Feb. 28, 1992. Before FLETCHER, D.W. NELSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Carlyle Norman (Norman) and Marian Norman appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Allstate Insurance (Allstate). The court determined that Allstate did not have a duty to defend or indemnify Norman in the underlying nuisance abatement action brought by the City of Novato (City). We affirm. FACTS 3 Norman built a radio antenna on his property as authorized by a City use permit. However, the City had failed to notify all interested parties when issuing the permit as required by city zoning procedures. The City later modified the permit after…